UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY’S MOVE TO OBTAIN
PEOPLE’S BANK ACCOUNTS DATA IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BY MOSES SSERWANGA
The
Uganda Bankers Association has come out strongly and rightly so to reject
machinations by the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) to obtain private
information of the banks’ customers data for taxation purposes.
At
least 30 commercial banks have since petitioned the Constitution Court to
declare section 42 of the Tax Procedures Act 2014 under which URA issued the notice to obtain banks’ clients
data , unconstitutional. For starters , the Uganda Constitution in article 27
provides for the unfettered right to privacy of personal information including
but not limited to the unauthorized disclosure of personal identity information
and photographs .
Although
parliament is yet to enact an enabling law about personal data protection
including the right to privacy of an individual’s photographs , it is an
internationally accepted legal principle that banks owe a fiduciary duty to their clients irrespective
of their standing in society . This is the same duty that applies to a doctor
and lawyer to clients relationship. The fiduciary relationship is premised on
the internationally established understanding
that whatever information comes in the possession of the said professionals
in course of their professional duty about their clients is treated as being
confidential and cannot be passed on to third parties without the express
permission of the affected individual or by court order in criminal and civil cases.
This same
principle is encapsulated in the Bank of Uganda Consumer Protection Guidelines 2011 which among others compel
commercial banks to treat their customers fairly and reasonably by not being
aggressive , humiliating and or intimidating .
Therefore ,
URA’s attempts to compel banks to disclose their clients banking information
was in total contravention of the constitution,
banking law and principle as we
have come to know them. It should also be noted that Uganda is a signatory to
the East African legal framework on the protection of personal information and
the cyber laws which was put in place in 2010.
Banks are
not at liberty to disclose without court order and if they go ahead to release
personal data of their clients they do so in breach of trust and
confidentiality and can be sued for specific and general damages .
This same
procedure applies to the notorious practice of banks running full page notices
where they publish photographs of people
who have defaulted on loans in national newspapers. This practice is not only humiliating to the affected individuals whose photographs are put in the
public domination and therefore exposed to third parties but it is also
fundamentally flawed and illegal.
The loan
contract is between the bank and the individual or entity to which the loan is
extended . That contract is never
intended for the knowledge of third parties even when there is a breach by
either party . The banking law and civil
procedures accord banks many legal channels through which they can recover a
loan from a defaulting customer without breaching their right to privacy .
The banks
can do so by either foreclosing a mortgage or
through court processes where they can obtain court orders for specific
cases . In decided cases courts have
stated that there is nothing immoral if an individual failed to repay a loan
due to circumstances beyond their control and that the practice of exhibiting a
photograph of a person and shamming them in public for the sin of being in an
impecunious condition cannot be encouraged in civilized societies.
Banks also
have a duty to adequately inform and educate their clientele about the implications
of taking out loans especially salaried loans which are pegged on an individual’s
“guarantee” to remain in employment . The practice by banks now is that once
such an individual loses their job the loan balances automatically fall due .
The question then is , how can such a person who has lost their job
automatically pay up for their loan balances ? This is the same problem that
brought the USA economy to its knees in the mid 2000s.
The
aggressive marketing of loans has dire ramifications for the banks , their
clients and the wellbeing of the
national economy . Banks being in a superior position must at all times act
judiciously.
The
writer is Media and Communications Consultant /Trainer
And Advocate of the High Court of Uganda
msserwanga@yahoo.com
1 comment:
GOOD DAY AND WELCOME TO STANDARD ONLINE FINANCE LTD
Do you need 100% Finance? I can fix your financial needs with a lower back problem of 3% interest rate. Whatever your circumstances, self employed, retired, have a poor credit rating, we could help. flexible repayment, Contact us at: standardonlineinvestment@gmail.com
Apply now for all types of loans and get money urgently!
* The interest rate is 3%
* Choose between 1 and 30 years of repayment.
* Choose between monthly and annual repayment plan.
* Terms and conditions of the flexibility of loans.
Regards,
Mr. Abdul Muqse
Post a Comment